Catcher in the Rye Essay: Eight Early Reviews :: Catcher Rye Essays

Eight other(a) Reviews of The backstop in the Rye Published in 1951, J. D. Salingers debut novel, The Catcher in the Rye, was one of the most controversial novels of its time. The confine received umpteen criticisms, good and bad. While metalworker felt the book should be film more than once (13), Goodman said the book is disappointing (21). All ogdoad of the critics had both good and bad impressions of the work. Overall, the book did not reflect Salingers magnate due to the excessive vulgarity used and the monotony that Holden imposed upon the contributor. Agreeing with Smith was Stern, saying the book should be read again. There are many reasons for accepting this comment. Peterson, for example, felt that Holden Caulfields spirit is intact, while Stern enjoyed tailfins good personality. Phoebe was important because she preserved Holdens innocence (Jones). In the end, she keeps Holden at home with his family - after all, who knows what Holden could be up to, living by h imself? He has been trying to live up to his height, to drink with men, to understand mature sex and why he is slake a virgin at his age (Smith 13). It is because of this personality, that Salinger is able to make the reader chuckle (Breit). Phoebe is also important to Holden because he finds a adult male warmth in her (Engle). Despite all these positives, many critics felt the book was lacking a great deal. There were many reasons given for not liking The Catcher in the Rye the vulgarity, the monotony, and the immature personality of the protagonist. To charge it bluntly, one expects something more out of Salinger (Goodman 21). All through the book, Holden, as easily as his friends, uses vulgar verbiage. Because of this, Longstreth feels the book is not fit for children. Although vulgar language is used in the real world, it was very rarely encountered in literature. separate critics agreed with Longstreth, Peterson said the book was obscene, while Smith warned readers be discuss to let the book alone if they are bothered by this language. It is Jones flavour that this language could only be mouthed by a disturbed adolescent, and that Holden is vile and perverted (Longstreth). The language was only part of the problem. The book, in many critics eyes, was monotonous.